Stop and Frisk Only Hurts Black and Brown Communities
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgP924TWJvl_jkBTvw02tApnTkIcs_rZvaq7JU_hBD78kCRZzLi9SokO-aVn2iT99trMr1EiitKjDpFbpiaCRuAENN291a-vWAPKh7r5WHe_fJdp-n8APn-bkZodRCfFoNIHSfE5yWo19Ac/w976-h529/stop-frisk.jpg)
by Anna LauBach, Director of Special Initiatives Patrick Sharkey, in his book An Uneasy Peace argues that Stop and Frisk policies did much to damage if not ruin any trusting relationship between police and the communities most impacted by violence. Stop and Frisk is the practice by which an individual can be stopped by the police if the officer has reason to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed, and then frisked if there is suspicion he/she is carrying a weapon. Before it was ruled unconstitutional in 2013, Stop and Frisk was disproportionately carried out in black and brown neighborhoods where citizens, especially young men, suffered dire consequences. Data from New York City show that at the height of Stop and Frisk in 2011, over 685,000 people were stopped by the police, 88 percent of whom were completely innocent, 53 percent were African American, 34 percent were Latinx, and 9 percent were white. As is becoming more widely acknowledged, violent crime in the c